I have truly enjoyed working with the folks at The Lawlor Group in my roles at three different institutions. I consider them collaborators, colleagues, motivators and teachers. Together we have had a long record of success and satisfaction.

W. Scott Friedhoff
Vice President for Enrollment
Allegheny College
Meadville, Pennsylvania

Survey sheds some light on corporate marketing structures

The Association of National Advertisers asked senior marketers in the corporate world about their companies’ marketing structure, and MarketingVox highlights the findings. When marketers were asked if, over the past two years, their marketing function has become more or less centralized, this was the breakdown:

• 49% reported more centralization
• 22% reported more decentralization
• 30 percent say it’s stayed the same

And when they were asked whether the structural changes have improved or worsened their marketing department’s abilities, these were the results:

• 48% reported an improvement
• 17% reported a worsening
• 36% reported no change

While this tells me something about trends and satisfaction, absent the second set of findings being segmented by the first set of findings, it tells me little about whether centralization or decentralization is proving more effective.

But the good news is that our next issue of The Lawlor Review will examine centralization and decentralization directly from the perspective of higher education marketers. Stay tuned!

Add your comments:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.