What sculpture is to a block of marble, education is to the soul.
—Joseph Addison
The Lawlor Group was thoughtful, observant, and very flexible and effective in communicating with our constituents, from students to faculty to trustees. As a result, we are more effective in capturing the attention of prospective students, and positioning the distinctive qualities of the Colgate experience.
— Mary Hill
Former Dean of Admission
Colgate University
Hamilton, New York
Now Co-Director of College Counseling
St. Paul Academy and Summit School
St. Paul, Minnesota
The Association of National Advertisers asked senior marketers in the corporate world about their companies’ marketing structure, and MarketingVox highlights the findings. When marketers were asked if, over the past two years, their marketing function has become more or less centralized, this was the breakdown:
• 49% reported more centralization
• 22% reported more decentralization
• 30 percent say it’s stayed the same
And when they were asked whether the structural changes have improved or worsened their marketing department’s abilities, these were the results:
• 48% reported an improvement
• 17% reported a worsening
• 36% reported no change
While this tells me something about trends and satisfaction, absent the second set of findings being segmented by the first set of findings, it tells me little about whether centralization or decentralization is proving more effective.
But the good news is that our next issue of The Lawlor Review will examine centralization and decentralization directly from the perspective of higher education marketers. Stay tuned!
Comments
No comments yet
Post new comment